Is there magic left in the world?

Logic rules the world. We no longer fear trolls or deities nor do we rely on spirits for inner peace. Is there magic left in the modern world, Anca M. Catana wonders.

Remember the movie Fight Club (1999)? If not, you can take a break, watch it and return to reading after.

Isn’t it somehow intriguing that your everyday, average individual would engage in such a “barbarian” activity, without any notable advantage? Sure, they were mostly men, but take another break and go watch Million Dollar Baby (2004).

The point is, we see it in sports, we see it in the arts, we see it in religions: people gather together to witness or take part in a short intense event, which moves a little bit of something within them.

Some 2400 years ago, in an attempt to explain what happens with the spectator while watching an ancient tragedy, Aristotle (tip: he was Greek), came up with a name for the phenomenon: catharsis, cleansing and purification of emotions.

Aristotle’s catharsis has always been connected to the idea of purification of emotions through arts, particularly the performing arts.

What the explanation fails to remember is that the theater witnessed by Aristotle didn’t limit itself to an artistic representation.

Instead, the Greek gods and goddesses were alive and well in the ancient tragedy. They had their own entrance in the scene purely for themselves and were always making the characters accountable for their actions, adding a religious or spiritual dimension to the whole catharsis concept.

Cleansing of gods

Back to the future and why you are reading about a two and a half millennia old word in a student magazine: as old as it is, catharsis couldn’t be more actual. Let me explain.

In our contemporary world, God/s, goddesses, demigods, not even witches, elves or trolls are walking among us anymore – nor do they send angry messages.

Smart beings as we are, we studied, understood and categorized everything. We know today that thunderstorms are not caused by Thor’s hammer but by the electrical charge of clouds, the world has been created rather by the Big Bang than the vomit of Mbombo, the Death worm from the Gobi desert is probably just a type of amphisbaenia, and a great flood is more likely to be the result of climate change than of divine wrath.

Not long ago, I was watching Nicholas Christakis’ TED talk The hidden influence of social networks, in which he explains his break-through discovery on how the social network of an individual affects surprising aspects of his or her life. These included their chances of getting divorced or obese.

It occured to me at that moment, that there is a worrisome paradox: we know so much about what surrounds us, but so little about ourselves as individuals and especially as communities.

Modern day catharsis

In our secularized society religious or spiritual laws and rituals are seen as naive, even dangerous if taken to fanaticism. The main reason being that they can’t be objectively verified, take horoscopes for example, so they fall in a category of pseudoscience.

Them not being objectively verifiable makes them prone to manipulation and re-interpretation which can lead to fraud or disastrous events, like the Jonestown Mass Suicide, where in 1978, over 900 people were manipulated into taking their own lives.

On the other hand, purging any non-rationality from our daily lives has left many feeling empty. We tend to blame mental health issues, depression and suicidal thoughts on financial problems, stress, substance abuse, but could they not also be attributed to a lack of magic in our lives, a lack of mystery or spirituality?

Could it be why the world of dragons and face-changing people of Game of Thrones became such a phenomenon? Is the unknown and unintelligible “a must” in our lives that also makes us vulnerable?

Our day to day existence becomes somewhat sisyphic when it lacks meaningful experiences and encounters. Like a Shyamalan movie, everything seems to be following its order, but the somewhat eerie atmosphere hints at something being off.

If magic and spirituality are the missing elements, how can we bring the unexplained back into our lives? Through art, through meditation, through forming our own rituals? And where is the limit: can they become dangerous? When can we become susceptible to being deceived and manipulated by some who, for example, figured that there is fat money to make out of our non-material needs?

Money for nothing

I am probably not the only one assaulted on social media by ads for products promising balance, gratefulness, love, peace, humbleness – for a small fee of course.

No matter how appealing the photoshopped landscapes are or how marvelous the shut-eyed ladies look in their fitted yoga pants in these ads, I can’t help myself from stopping and wondering about the absurdity of it all.

The current ads remind me of the medieval practice of selling indulgences: a bit of money is all that it takes to save your soul and sanity.

Remember the catharsis phenomenon from the beginning of this text that required people to actually get together and live an event as a community? Well, fear no more, as in our contemporary world you need to meet no one, talk to no one, go to no crowded or chaotic gatherings.

You can enjoy the benefits, free your mind and liberate your spirit while isolating yourself in your living room with buds in your ears, listening for the 100th time to the same monotone voice praising you for taking time off to “take care of yourself” – for a small fee.

Lost inner peace

Where is the limit, then? When are we having our mind and soul cared for and when are we having them exploited? To whom should we trust the most sensitive parts of ourselves: the stranger or the one close to us? The professional or the loving one?

And talking about professionals, where does professionalism start and where does it end? Nevertheless, why do we seem to crave the inexplicable only to try to explain it afterwards?

I wish I had at least some of the answers for these questions in order to be able to write a nice and comforting conclusion, but that’s no easy task.

As a result I invite you to think about all the magic present in your life, reflect on whether you would need more of it and most importantly, where and with whom could you find it.

Anca M. Catana

Education student, theater enthusiast, nature lover. Curious, spontaneous and ambitious, open for new challenges.

Lue lisää:

Linnanmaa, the city center and student experience – what will happen to the campus?

Last Autumn the University of Oulu informed the media they would start an inquiry into the future of the Linnanmaa campus. It was brought up that the campus could be moved to the city center. According to the rector, building a new campus in the city center would be an investment in students, the environment as well as the city.

Read this story in Finnish.

 

The relocation of Linnanmaa campus caused a lot of buzz last autumn. In November the university started an inquiry into a real estate strategy project. The options are the following: renovating  the old buildings, a completely new property built in Linnanmaa or the relocation of the campus to the city center.

The reasons behind the inquiry are the aging campus and the high rent of the property that would rise even higher if the current campus was renovated.

The question is: would the university campus really move to city center? Yes, it would, says the head of the real estate strategy project, rector Jouko Niinimäki.

“There is more to it than the high rent,” Niinimäki starts.

According to the rector, the rent of the property is negotiable. However, there are other problems with the old campus.

“The life cycle of the property is coming to its end. The current campus has functioned well for almost 50 years but the aging means that renovations are needed. It’s either renovation, building a new campus or relocation.”

Why move?

Why then is relocating the best choice?

Niinimäki says that the decision concerns the future of the university and the future generations of students. The amount of students is dropping as age groups approaching university education are smaller. That means that there will be more competition between universities.

“The University of Oulu has to be even more attractive so we can get students from other growth centers as well. The new campus and new location would help the university become a nationwide topic in media”, says Niinimäki.

The relocation to the city center is more a question of reputation rather than property to the rector: it is a way to make the university more appealing. In his speech he repeats the words student experience.

“Nowadays more and more students want to live in the city center. If the university, their hobbies and living would be in the same area, the students would experience the university as more pleasant as well.

According to Niinimäki, it’s important to have easy access to the campus. The new location  is  planned to be near the railway station which would make it easier to commute to the campus when arriving from another city.

“Aalto university and all the other big universities are easy to travel to. A central location would attract more students from the north, south and east alike”, says Niinimäki.

Concerned with carbon

When making plans for the new campus, the environment and carbon emissions will also be considered.

“The Linnanmaa campus is old and the shape of it is flat. We have big glass walls, and the building is far from being energy efficient”, says Niinimäki.

By moving the university to the city center, the need for traveling by car would decrease. That would in turn decrease the carbon emissions of the university.

“The current public transport won’t be able to keep up with combined University of Applied Sciences UAS and University campus. I already get feedback from students about how the buses are too full. We can’t rely on people driving their own cars to campus if we seek carbon neutrality.”

Niinimäki sees transport as a crucial problem regarding student experience. He has read that in Helsinki only one third of the young people get a driver’s license. Niinimäki believes the future generations of students want to continue using public transport to commute to their studies.

A project for the ages

The inquiry into the campus properties is meant to be ready this spring. Niinimäki says that he intends to present the subject to the board of the university in April. The board will decide whether to renovate, rebuild or relocate.

If the board will support the relocation, there is still years before the move would eventually happen. The moving would happen one faculty at a time in the time frame of 2026–2040.

“Most of the current students would not see the new campus as students anymore by the time the relocation happens”, says Niinimäki.

Even though the new plans might feel daunting, Niinimäki is excited. He hopes that the students feel the same positivity.

“Whatever the decision will be, we are always thinking of the well-being of our students. This decision is being made for the benefit of students and their experience.”

The future campus

Even though plans regarding the new campus are still only in the hypothetical phases, ideas regarding the design have been thrown around. Being located near the railway station seems to be fairly set.

Niinimäki thinks having the university in the center of the city would also help bring new life into Oulu.

“Even though the vitality of the city isn’t really a part of university’s tasks, by relocating we could help bring some energy into the city center and make Oulu more appealing as a city.”

Niinimäki mentions the Myllypuro campus of Metropolia as an inspiration for the new property. The brand new Myllypuro campus was designed by Oulu-based architect Rainer Mahlamäki.

So far no official plans for the design of the new university have not been made. However, architect students in Oulu are designing a hypothetical new campus as a part of a course lead by Mahlamäki.

Niinimäki states that the coursework is purely playful, but who knows.

“The new campus would be an investment for the future. I would ask the students not to worry!” Niinimäki concludes

Iida Putkonen

Oulun ylioppilaslehden entinen päätoimittaja. Tiedeviestinnän maisteri ja glögin ympärivuotinen kuluttaja. Etsii revontulia, riippumattoja ja juuri oikeita sanoja.

Lue lisää:

Time to say goodbye – how it feels to leave Oulu

In this article Pablo Santur interviews former students, tells their stories and explores how it feels to be leaving Oulu and say goodbye.

Many of us came to Oulu excited for the new path unfolding in front of us. Since the moment we decided to come, we knew a journey was beginning. Only at the very end can we say if we got what we were looking for.

We may have begun seeking a better future, a professional improvement, or just a new beginning. Still, we can never be fully aware of the potential hiding behind our expectations. The unexpected parts are the places to discover, moments to live, or challenges to overcome. 

Once someone told me that the difficult part of going back home after staying somewhere for a long time is realizing that you have two homes. You are going back to your family and friends, but also leaving behind new friends. In this article we are going to discover pieces of the journey of some former students who already left Oulu, and hear how it feels to say goodbye.

Every journey begins with a step

To reach the university, we all had to take many different steps. Some reached the university in a rush, without too much planning. This was the case of Héctor Pijeira-Díaz, Vasiliki (Vaso) Mylonopoulou and Tiina Strand

Héctor was still working on his master’s thesis in Spain when he found out about a PhD position in Oulu and decided to apply. Similarly, Vaso was in Sweden looking for a job when she was accepted as a doctoral student. That was the beginning of the journey for them. 

It was a little bit different for Tiina. She was originally planning to go further down south from Sodankylä, her hometown. However, her plans changed when she was accepted to the university of Oulu. Even then, she thought it was only going to be for 5 years. In the end, it turned out it would take longer than that before she continued the journey she had in mind years earlier.

 

Feeling lonely and friendless was the hardest thing I faced in Oulu.

 

Not everyone’s path was full of unexpected turnarounds. There are those who were able to picture the path they were going to follow and execute the plan with surgical precision. That was the case for Axel Cima, Lourdes Malacara and Kassandra Hernández. From all corners of Hispanic countries (Argentina, Mexico and Spain, respectively), they did an extensive search for programs that matched their interests.

While Axel was focused on economic geology, Lourdes and Kassandra were interested in education. Lourdes was interested in the links between education and technology, while Kassandra wanted to look into the pedagogic strategies of Finnish teachers. After a lengthy process reviewing several programs in different cities, they choose Oulu as their destination.

Fatema struggled to make friends at first.

Looking for company for the ride

As main characters of our own story, we accepted the solitude in coming to Oulu and leaving behind our familiar lives. Even though every journey began individually, we needed to build bonds with people to overcome the challenges along the path. For some it was easier, while others struggled.

 

The sense of community is very precious thing and it’s hard to come by after you graduate.

 

The latter was the case for Fatema Tuj Zohora, then Master student in molecular medicine. Even though she found many opportunities for her research interests at the university, she had a hard time developing connections. As she remembers: “In the very beginning, I didn’t feel welcomed. It was very hard to find a friend in the classroom. Feeling lonely and friendless was the hardest thing I faced in Oulu.” 

Some other students were lucky enough to be able to find a group of people that accompanied them through the entire journey. Axel is grateful for the solid group of classmates who stuck with him during his 2-year programme. 

“Since the very beginning we formed a wonderful group of international people from every continent and we stuck together. Multiculturalism and friendship were great pillars for this experience.”

Likewise, Tiina highlights the relevance of people in her university experience. Vappu has especially been a very special time for her. 

“It felt like all the students were out and about and you could make new friends everywhere. The sense of community is very precious thing and it’s hard to come by after you graduate.”

Hector’s biggest challenge was his multidisciplinary PhD.

Surprises along the path

A Finnish expression says: “Elämä ei ole ruusuilla tanssimista” – literally, life is not dancing on roses – meaning life is not exempt of troubles. Indeed, the troubles faced along the way also left deep traces in us. 

One challenge for exchange students was the cold and long-lasting dark season. Lourdes knew about the cold weather before arriving, but she still felt sad and lacked energy to do her research during the winter. 

“I wanted to sleep most of the time and did not want to do my assignments”, she says. 

Despite the struggle, winter changed Lourdes’ view about locals for the better. 

“Before moving to Finland, I had the notion that Finnish people were ‘cold’. Instead I found that while Finnish people take their time to know you, once they trust you they are really friendly and nice. They really care for their friends, and they support you in difficult times but also in happy moments”, she says.

Sometimes the biggest challenge was else, something you could not see coming. That was the case for Vaso, for whom her studies became the biggest challenge to overcome. 

“I think the PhD itself was difficult. I have not yet met a doctoral researcher who is doing perfectly well mentally. A PhD takes years, and one really only believes that they can make it at the defence. The years before are full of uncertainty, doubts, and random deadlines.”

Similarly, his PhD challenged Héctor to reinvent himself. Coming from a totally different academic background, he had to work extra hard to fully embrace the multidisciplinary nature of his research.

 

I have not yet met a doctoral researcher who is doing perfectly well mentally.

 

“I had an engineering background and came to work in educational psychology. My thesis had a very strong component of physiological data. So, you know psychophysiology, educational psychology, computer science, that mix was difficult.” 

Kassandra feels sad to be leaving Oulu.

The end of one journey is the beginning of another

At the end of the journey, new decisions had to be made for the future. In the case of some our interviewees, their studies in Oulu gave them clarity of mind about their perspectives and priorities. 

Axel for one discovered his deep bonds with his home country. 

“I realized how much I was missing my family, friends, girlfriend and culture. I decided to finish my degree, pack my stuff and return home.”

Similarly, Fatema’s desires and goals lead her to Germany to continue her PhD. However she left with some mixed feelings.

“I’ll miss Oulu and my friends over here a lot. But my career goal is leading me there.”

Vaso also felt like her path lead her further away. 

“After spending a few of months in Oulu, I realized that I would leave it either for Helsinki or most possibly for another country. I did not know when and where, but both my partner and I felt like this”. 

Some, however, left with less clarity, not knowing if they would be back or not. That was the case for Tiina, who moved to Helsinki.

“Oulu is a good place to live. I have nothing against moving back to Oulu, it’s just that I have to be somewhere else for a while.”

Some say goodbye, hoping to come back and visit former friends. For others, leaving is not so easy. As Kassandra says: 

“I feel very sad about leaving Oulu, because it has felt like home all this time. It’s difficult to me to say goodbye to people without knowing when I will see them again, or even worse, if I ever will.”

 

“When you miss a place, what you really miss is the time that corresponds to that place; sites are not missed, but times. ”

Jorge Luis Borges

 

Pablo Santur

Learning specialist in thesis writing mode. Former TV scriptwriter. Foodie. Anime lover. Twitter: @pablodsantur

Lue lisää:

Taking visible steps towards sustainable development – what has the University of Oulu done? 

During the past couple of years, public discussion on sustainability has shifted. The question is no longer whether we need to take action but where do we need to start. Around the world, universities have started to commit themselves to sustainability. To see what action the University of Oulu is taking, we interviewed the Sustainability Planning Officer Anni Huovinen.

Anni Huovinen is a project manager and planning officer for the university’s sustainability projects. The first of her kind, she explains her position to be a person dedicated to sustainability activities and public relations.

One of Huovinen’s tasks has been to design a sustainability website where different kinds of projects, research, and events are presented to the public. She has also invested in a campus-wide event: the Sustainable Development Week.

The idea for the week came from the Advisory Board of Sustainable Development. It was co-organized together with TellUs and the Student Union OYY. The purpose of the week was to raise awareness and to create a campus-wide discussion and an atmosphere towards sustainable development. 

The university launched the Sustainable Development Week on October 7th to 9th, 2019. According to Huovinen, this was the first time that the university had a week focused entirely on sustainability. 

 “It’s a broad enough topic to easily have a sustainability month with events every day,” she comments. 

The week-long event breathed life into the campus via a series of panel discussions, workshops, documentary viewing, and an NGO fair.

Anni Huovinen says the planning started back in April. There was no previous experience or structures, and they had a limited budget to work with. 

In the end, the Week’s planning team incorporated various themes and perspectives into the schedule. For example, OYY proposed perspectives from the Global South in many events, the documentary “The Chocolate Case” as an example.

The Advisory Board of Sustainable Development helped by bringing guest speakers from different sectors, such as the Finnish Environment Institute, other universities and the Ministry of Education and Culture.

Time for feedback

One of the events was “Rector’s Coffee Break” with Jouko Niinimäki, the Rector of The university. There all campus members had the opportunity to learn about and discuss issues in sustainability with the rector. The purpose was to channel feedback and demands for sustainable change from bottom to top.

During the session, a feedback board was set up to directly collect students’ concerns, wishes, demands, or opinions. At the end, 136 notes were collected and later delivered to the rector himself. 

The event came at a good time, since the Strategy of the University of Oulu for the upcoming 4 years is currently being designed. The new Strategy will update the current one and starts its 4-year-term in 2020.

What kind of holistic actions the Strategy implies for sustainability is to be seen. However we can see the university’s ambition towards “sustainable development in the north” and emphasis on “the sustainable use of natural resources” already. 

In this regard, we can expect more action to be taken as the university has started collaborating with the Oulu University of Applied Sciences (Oulu UAS) for common sustainability goals. There are also plans on installing the university’s own solar panels. 

The university’s role

Why is sustainability an issue at universities?

“Universities have great responsibility and agency. They have a lot of power outside the organization,” Anni Huovinen says. 

She explains that universities affect the world in many ways. 

Firstly, the universities accommodate thousands of people including students, faculty, and staff. Secondly, they educate future teachers, citizens, leaders, and consumers. Thirdly, they influence local communities and industries through research and collaboration.

“The university’s values get passed on to people. In that way have a very wide reach in different sectors in society”, Huovinen says. 

She gives an example of a recent event: the Student Union of the University of Helsinki announced that beef would no longer be included in the meals served in all the Ylva’s UniCafes.The goal was to reduce carbon footprint in food consumption.

Soon after, a plethora of news articles covering this issue was published. The case reaching audiences nationwide and created a chain of discussions on meat consumption. This also prompted Uniresta, a restaurant provider in Oulu, to respond

Huovinen explains that besides having influence on discussion and setting examples in societies, universities also affect policy-making decisions through scientific research. 

According to Huovinen, our current society often views universities as useful to the economic system, with the goal to make our GDP grow. However, from this point of view, the additional societal and philosophical purpose of universities might be overlooked and sacrificed. She thinks the purpose and impact of universities needs to be looked into. 

“We should talk more about the role of universities in our society. Are we here to make the economy grow? Is that the purpose of future professionals?”

Individual responsibility in sustainability and coming together

Just as universities can open a nation-wide discussion, individuals together can open a university-wide discussion. In a setting where people often find themselves willing to help but unsure where to start, grass-roots activity can help.

The university’s Advisory Board aims to mobilise different university stakeholders to take action on sustainability, and propose constructive policies to the university’s management team. Currently, open meetings are held on an irregular basis, where all students are encouraged and welcome to join.

The Sustainability Week inspired even the person arranging it, Anni Huovinen. The speech by Arto O. Salonen gave her a new perpective.

“The discussion around sustainability is often focused on the challenge that we can’t let go of our lifestyle: we can’t let go of our cars, and we want to buy a new cell phone every year. I found hope in Salonen’s idea that you are getting a more meaningful life when you let go of things. You become more sustainable and get closer to where you want to be,” she says.

Just as many of us feel hopeless or powerless when being confronted with environmental crises, Huovinen feels the same. Constantly confronting sustainability and the hard facts about climate change sometimes get to her. However there is hope, and what makes her hopeful is a new empowered generation willing to push for a change.

“The new generation have a very different view on consuming. They grew up in a new paradigm, where we can not continue living in certain ways, even though they might be seen as normal in our society.” 

 

Ending note from the writers:

We as students want to add that we hope to see concrete action by the university to fight climate change. This can mean increasing teaching about climate change and sustainability issues, creating more opportunities for collective action, unifying stakeholders through creative ways, and reducing the university’s operation carbon footprint.

At the same time, we also appeal to all our peers to become active. Find ways to get involved with larger groups that are working for sustainable development. In the end, all of us together create the sustainable changes we want to see in the environmental, social, and economic systems.

 

Written by Thea Yan Pan and Filip Polák 

Thea Yan Pan

Studying in the Education and Globalisation program. Originally from China and currently interested in collaborating with students from different faculties to make our university more sustainable.

Lue lisää:

Useful and close-by – this is what the new board of OYY wants to be

This year's board of OYY wants to be easy to approach. The new members want to be able to offer each student union member something, whether it be  advocating on their behalf or events.

TEKSTI Iida Putkonen

KUVAT Iida Putkonen

In Finnish.

The voluntary membership of the Student Union and the move of Oamk are things the new Board of the Student Union is facing this year. The group wants to make sure the collaboration between OYY and OSAKO, the student union of the University of Applied Sciences, goes smoothly. They also want to offer even better services for students. Eetu Leinonen, the new president describes the fresh Board as diverse and balanced.

“We have members from many different fields and varying experiences in student influencing.”

“All of us are from different student guilds. We also prove you don’t need a long policital career to be on the Board”, Eevasisko Mehtätalo says.

Despite their different backgrounds, the new members of the Board are similar in one way: they would not have applied, had they not been encouraged.

We interviewed the group about how they are feeling about the upcoming year. All of the members as well as the president answered the same questions. Read the responses below.

 

  1. Why did you apply to be on the Board?
  2. What is your history in student influencing?
  3. What do you wish to accomplish on the Board in 2020?
  4. Are you excited about something in particular? Is something making you nervous?
  5. How are you going to fit the Board into your life? Are you going to keep studying? 
  6. What has OYY done well in the past and what do you think should be improved on?
  7. How would you like the Student Union to be when you leave your post?
  8. What would you like to say to your fellow students?

Eetu Leinonen

Eetu Leinonen, 21, a fourth year student of mathematics and statistics and freshman of Finnish

The Chair of the Board: Board chairman, ownership and external stakeholder activities  

“Last year I was the president of the Advocacy Section and I got to look into the advocacy work. It was then that I started thinking of applying to the Board. Eventually that thought grew into wanting to be the President.

As a student influencer I have also been the President of Oulun Luonnontieteilijät ry OLuT.

On the Board I want to make sure people feel OYY is useful. I also hope that the work goes smoothly, as there have been changes in the organization. Hopefully we can also help the next Board get a good start.

I am especially excited about the anniversary of OYY.

What makes me a little nervous is adapting to the Student Union everyday life. This is different compared to student guilds.

I intend to keep studying and finish my master’s thesis. For example I am taking a course in Udmurt language.

I would like the future OYY to be more open and closer to students. I would hope the Student Union can offer each member something, since we are doing this from students to students.

You can come talk to me about anything, it doesn’t have to be related to the Student Union. I like to be an unofficial guidance counselor: I know WebOodi by heart.”

 

Tia Rahkila

Tia Rahkila, 23, a third year student of finance

The First Vice Chair of the Board, responsible for academic affairs

“I thought it would be nice to be able to make a difference. I only applied to the Board after the initial application period, because Santeri encouraged me to apply.

Previously I’ve been on the board of the student guild of finance, Finanssi.

I am most looking forward to meeting all the academic affairs representatives of all the guilds. I can’t wait to start working!

What makes me nervous is responsibility. I would say it’s a good kind of nervous, though.

I intend to keep studying while I am on the Board. My goal is to finish my bachelor’s during the summer. Exercise helps me stay energized.

I enjoyed the ‘kaverikoirat’ dogs from the previous years.

What I wrote on my application as well was that I’d like to bring OYY closer to each member. I want OYY to give back. I also want to develop academic affairs and advocacy work even further.

I’d like to say that there is no need to be scared of me even though I talk a lot. I can also listen.”

 

Jarkko Impola

Jarkko Impola, 23, fourth year student of educational sciences

The Second Vice Chair of the Board, responsible for finances

“Applying to the Board was a last minute decision. The job was appealing, but I wasn’t certain I had enough experience or know-how. After encouragement, I applied.

Earlier I have been on the board of the guild of education sciences, Motiva, for 3 years the last of which I was president.

This year I want to create a good foundation for co-operation between OYY and OSAKO. On top of that I want to promote an environment where everyone is seen as a student equally, despite which university you come from. Personally I would like to become a better performer during this year.

I am particularly excited for the opportunity to learn about the university community as a whole. I am escaping the bubble of my faculty and meeting students and staff all around. That is exciting.

What makes me nervous about the year on the Board is time management. In this position you have to plan your life in a whole new way: how much time do I spend on this, on studies, the rest of my life. I am at the very least taking a break from my master’s thesis at the moment.

I want to help develop OYY to be something you want to be a part of in the future, even voluntarily.

I hope people approach me especially concerning the Oamk move.”

 

Petra Nieminen

Petra Nieminen, 25, fourth year student of biology

Member of the Board, responsible for social affairs, tutor trainings and international affairs

“Someone in a meeting of the Student Council asked, why none of us had applied to be on the Board. I thought it would be nice to join, but I was not sure if I would have enough time. Benjamin Michelin from last year’s Board took an evening off to respond to my questions and assured me he had finished his master’s thesis along the job on the board. That helped me feel like I could apply.

Earlier I have been on the board of OLuT ry for two years. I’ve also been on the Student Council.

I hope that through the Board I gain confidence and trust in how I do things.

I’m looking forward to seeing how collaboration with OSAKO shapes up. It holds great potential.

What makes me nervous is scheduling. I am trying to do my master’s thesis on the side. I’ve tried to draw a line between work and home: I don’t bring work from the office home, and that is already showing in how I am managing.

In the past I feel OYY has not been able to become close to students.

I would like to leave an equal Student Union where everyone feels like they belong – and one people want to belong to.

I want to say I am not cold, even though I am quiet at times. If I don’t know something, I will look into it. You can approach me regarding anything.”

 

Santeri Siira

Santeri Siira, 24, a fifth year student of mechanical engineering 

Member of the Board, responsible for events

“I had thought about joining the Board earlier, but I didn’t quite dare apply. The members of last year’s Board encouraged me to apply last spring. I thought about it through autumn and had a lot of encouragement.

Earlier I have been on the board of the guild of mechanical engineering Koneinsinöörikilta for two years. I’ve also been on the board of OLTO ry, Medical Technology Students of Oulu for a year and on the Student Council.

I want to do my part in developing events. I’d like the members of OYY to feel like the student union is theirs, not a foreign actor, and feel like the events are easy and nice to attend.

We have had a good group spirit even before the official year on the Board, so I think the Board will be a good one. I am mostly nervous about the anniversary of OYY.

The challenging thing about work on the Board is that you can never finish advocacy work. There is always more to be done, and you can’t possibly finish everything during your term. The OYY Board has a less clear frame compared to guild work.

My intention is to study a little bit on the side so I can finish my bachelor’s.

You can come talk to me especially if you have development ideas for events or OYY. You can also talk to me if you want to know more about OYY.”

 

Eevasisko Mehtätalo

Eevasisko Mehtätalo, 24, a student of molecular medicine

Member of the Board, responsible for communications and campus development

“I applied to be on the board after the initial application period, because I was encouraged to apply. At first I felt like I wasn’t capable or I didn’t have enough merits. I also thought this would be a full-time job. However, the members of last year’s Board clarified that I can work on my master’s thesis and studies all while being on the Board.

Previously I have done just about everything a student can do. The most important things for me were two years on the board of biochemistry student guild Histoni and 5 years as a halloped student representative in the biochemistry and molecular medicine faculty.

I would like for OYY to be more visible on the Kontinkangas campus after this year and for the students there to have equal opportunity to participate in events and get services. I also want to learn more regarding communications, such as making layouts and concise expression.

What interest me the most this year is the new communications project where I feel I can challenge myself.

I am nervous about my own time management. January has been straining in some parts due to the sheer amount of new information. I plan on studying on the side and finishing my master’s thesis before Midsummer. In other aspects of my life I am going to put energy into my own health and relationships.

I would like for all students to know they are a part of OYY. Everyone belongs in the Student Union and it is not some ‘higher being’.”

 

Reeta Mäki-Pollari

Reeta Mäki-Pollari, 25, a fifth year student of educational sciences

Member of the Board, responsible for organizations

“I was coached into the Board for a few years, but I wanted to get my studies to a place where I would be comfortable. After good encouraging speeches I decided to give it a try. This year the project in municipality influencing is so good, I felt like I had a chance to showcase my potential.

Throughout my studies I have been a part of almost everything a student can be. I was the president of the guild of early childhood education, Lastarit, and I have been on the Student Council for two terms.

I would like for OYY to be familiar to everyone and that even the students who aren’t actively involved would know the structure of the Student Union and how it works. In my own sector I would hope that students voices will be heard in decision making on the municipal level, for example in elections.

I am nervous about whether all the plans will come true and if everything will be done correctly. I intend to work on my master’s thesis throughout my term on the Board.

In my opinion OYY has been able to make itself more transparent and open: the Student Union is no longer an insider job in the same way it used to be.

What I would hope for is that the good team spirit of the Board shows.

I would like to say that even though I am tall, I can hear you all the way up here.”

Iida Putkonen

Oulun ylioppilaslehden entinen päätoimittaja. Tiedeviestinnän maisteri ja glögin ympärivuotinen kuluttaja. Etsii revontulia, riippumattoja ja juuri oikeita sanoja.

Lue lisää:

The Student Council cuts the grants for societies to around 10,000 euros in 2020, only the smallest subject societies continue to receive funding

In Finnish In relation to the budget, the Student Union of the University of Oulu (OYY) decided in its meeting on 10 Dec 2019 to cut the grants for subject and interest societies in 2020. The Board of OYY presented two proposals to the Student Council: in the first proposal the grants for societies would […]

In Finnish

In relation to the budget, the Student Union of the University of Oulu (OYY) decided in its meeting on 10 Dec 2019 to cut the grants for subject and interest societies in 2020.

The Board of OYY presented two proposals to the Student Council: in the first proposal the grants for societies would be 25,000 euros and in the other 17,750 euros in 2020. After voting, the meeting adopted the counterproposal by Lääketietellisen vaaliliiton edustajistoryhmä (“Medical Electoral Alliance”, LED) with grants of 10,600 euros for 2020.

In addition to the amount, also the recipients were limited: according to the proposal, only interdisciplinary societies that are open to all OYY’s members should receive funding. This includes the interest societies but not the subject societies. The subject societies that have less than hundred members are an exception. These small societies will be funded with 1,400 euros and the remaining 9,200 euros will be directed to the interest societies.

This year OYY has granted grants to societies with 17,736 euros, of which 10,070 euros were to subject societies and 7,665 euros to interest societies.

“In practice, OYY’s all income consists of membership fees. When every student in the university has to pay the fee, there should be sufficient grounds for using the money. At the moment this kind of funding isn’t beneficial to everyone, and large societies and certain faculties are relegated to the sidelines. Part of the reason is in the process and part in the interest to apply for funding – but the end result is skewed nevertheless,” Eelis Palokangas, member of LED, justifies their proposal.

Palokangas sees the grants as an unnecessary transfer payment from one student to another. He thinks that there are other ways for the subject societies to raise money: they can, for example, raise the membership fee or work harder on fund-raising.

“In the faculties that receive most of the grants (Faculties of Education, Humanities and Science), the grants are approximately 2 euros per student. We think that finding a substitute for that small amount isn’t impossible, especially for bigger subject societies. The smaller ones will certainly be affected. The societies that have less than hundred members would be guaranteed the same support as they have received this year,” Palokangas says.

Is the reason behind LED’s proposal that for example Oulun Lääketieteellinen Kilta (“The Medical Guild of Oulu”) has had too big turnover to apply for grant?

The criteria for the activity grants states that if the income and expenses are over 100,000 euros in total, the society will not primarily receive the grant. The criteria also states that this kind of society can, however, receive the grant if they give reasons for the need of financial assistance in their application.

“When you think about it, we have over 1,000 students in the Faculty of Medicine, and only a small percentage of the paid membership fees comes back to the Terveystieteiden kilta (“Health Science Guild”), it is seen as an unfair system. When we thought about this proposal, we came to the conclusion that the system is redundant,” Palokangas says.

Before the meeting, other council groups Interdisciplinary Election Circle (PoVa), the Green list and Tieteelliset (“Science students”) published a common position, where they declared to support the Board’s proposal to grant activity grants to the subject and interest societies in the future as well.

The position states that “viable student associations benefit the whole university community. For example, guilds organise student culture, events, services, and other things that help the students integrate into the university community. Together, OYY and the student guilds can promote students’ interest in a more effective way at the university and in the society.”

According to the undersigned groups, the counterproposal was presented to the Student Council in a rush and there hasn’t been enough time to appropriately consider its implications.

The discussion about the activity grants was lively in the Student Council meeting. The voting was tight.

The proposal 1 (25,000 euros) was defeated by 26 to 11 and the proposal 2 (17,750 euros) by one vote 19–18.

In the voting, LED themselves and Opiskelevat Kokoomusnuoret (“Coalition Party Students”) sided unanimously with LED’s proposal. Unanimously against the proposal were PoVa, the Green list, Tieteelliset and Keskustaopiskelijoiden ja sitoutumattomien vaaliliitto (“The Centre Party Students and the Independents”). Members of Tekniikan ja Talouden vaalirengas (“The Election Circle of Technology and Economy Students”, TeTa) were divided: some sided with LED’s proposal while others were against it.

After the Board’s proposals had been rejected, there was a vote on LED’s proposal (10,600 euros), where the votes were 20–17 in favor of the proposal.

The Student Council members Aino-Kaisa Manninen (Green list), Roosa Heinonen (PoVa), Bruno Gioia Sandler (PoVa), Timi Kärki (PoVa), Salla Karhunen (PoVa) and Jarkko Impola (PoVa) expressed a dissenting opinion.

The amount of grants to societies is decided annually in relation to the budget. The amount has varied along the years: for example, in 2016, the societies received 23,497 euros in total, in 2017 14,874 euros and in 2018 16,969 euros. Starting from 2018, OYY has granted all grants as activity grants and not separately as project grants or special grants.

Translation: Essi Ranta

Anni Hyypiö

Oulun ylioppilaslehden entinen päätoimittaja. Twitter: @AnniHyypio

Lue lisää: